the white colour circle

I went to the Olafur Eliason exhibition at the Museum of Contemporary Art a few weeks ago. There was a lot there to wonder at, but the piece that fascinated me most of all was The white colour circle. I spent a long time looking at it, went away and then came back again to sit down in front of it and look some more. So many shades of white like so many shades of nothing. Or, so many shades of everything.

If time does not flow like a river, if the moments we live can be not consecutive, if they can be like the pigeon holes with the light shining on them in random order in Fred Hoyle’s October the First is Too Late, then I see all the shades of white and almost-white as another representation of this idea.

But it also made me think about living moments concurrently. Scientifically, I’m sure this doesn’t work because our consciousness can only be in one place at one time, but what if? What if all those different shades of white were all the moments we could live at the same time? Like all the radio stations playing on the dial at once in Jeanette Winterson’s Tanglewreck.

In each patch of white lives a moment. But is it predetermined or is it ours to do as we please with?

Posted in art, books, physics | Leave a comment

you can never quarantine the past

I experienced time travel on Thursday night. I went to see the Pavement reunion show at the Enmore Theatre and they took me right back to the 1990s. I saw them a few times in the mid-to-late 90s and was at their last-ever (to that point) concert in London in 1999. On Thursday night suddenly I found myself back there, sitting in London’s Brixton Academy, on the brink of my life changing. These last ten years melted away and the precious years of the 2000s were all in front of me. And the band still makes incredible noise. Maybe even better than before. The sensation was bittersweet and beautiful.

Posted in london, music, sydney, times goes by so | Leave a comment

i’m living history. and time is getting faster.

Dear Cettefemme,

So many things… where to start.

My friend J came to stay a couple of weekends ago. I was telling her about an article I’d read in the 2nd–15th February edition of The Big Issue, where the author had been taking photos of decaying shop signs in his neighbourhood, prior to the buildings being demolished, and in the process had met an old lady who remembered what all the shops had been when she was a little girl. The encounter had been magic but reading the article I’d felt nothing at all, except a vague sense of impatience to get to the end. I was almost angry about the exquisite piece of writing he could have created, but didn’t. How much he could have made me think and feel, but didn’t. Though there was one sentence I loved: “It’s as if the woman is picking up pieces of a jigsaw and showing them to me”. Then J told me about a website she’d discovered that showed the work of a photographer called Sergei Larenkov, who has overlaid photos of modern-day St Petersburg with photos taken during the Siege of Leningrad. Examples can be found here and here. Astonishing. If only I could scratch away at the surface and find the living history on my own city streets.

Which brings me to a quote by William Faulkner that I found by accident yesterday: “The past isn’t dead. In fact, it’s not even past.” I haven’t had time to even start thinking about the implications of what that means, or researching the context in which he said it, so I think you’ll be hearing more about that from me later.

I read Jeanette Winterson’s Tanglewreck last week. It was exciting to discover that a writer I love is interested in the physics of time, and has used those scientific ideas as the basis for what is such a good story. I recognised loads of the science but learnt about new things too: wave functions and entanglement. I think I need to read a book about quantum physics. (An easy book. Written for the lay person.) And she had some wonderful images/metaphors: entering a building via the past (absolute genius), and reality being like a series of radio stations all available on the dial at once – a brilliant description not just for alternate realities but, to expand further in a direction that interests me, for the all the different moments of our lives. I’m going to read this book again.

And to end on a scientific note, I read yesterday that the the Chilean earthquake from last weekend has shortened Earth’s days. As did the 2004 Sumatra earthquake. Time is going faster. What does that mean?

Hope all is good with you. Lots of love,

Bombshell

Posted in art, bombshell, books, physics, times goes by so | Leave a comment

Belle and Sebastian

As I was making pancakes in my Sydney kitchen last night I suddenly found myself catapulted back into my London kitchen. Not my most recent London kitchen but one from more than four years ago. The time travel came courtesy of Belle and Sebastian’s album Tigermilk. I went through a period where I played it constantly in that flat, in the kitchen, while I cooked or did the dishes. It is one of the sounds of that era of my life, but I don’t think I’ve listened to it since. Hearing the album last night didn’t bring back forgotten memories and the songs aren’t material objects so the experience doesn’t pass the Proust test. But the music does contain a reflection of me from that time. The feelings were so immediate. I was really there, looking out the window into a darkening London evening.

Posted in london, music, proust, sydney | Leave a comment

the past is dead, long live the past

“It is the same with our past. It is a waste of effort for us to try to summon it, all the exertions of our intelligence are useless. The past is hidden outside the realm of our intelligence and beyond its reach, in some material object (in the sensation that this material object would give us) which we do not suspect. It depends on chance whether we encounter this object before we die, or do not encounter it.” Proust, The Way by Swann’s, Penguin, 2003: p47.

I read this one afternoon almost two weeks ago. I’d been with my parents that morning looking for the flat in Newtown they’d spent a few months living in 40 years ago. We found the street easily enough but they struggled to identify where the block of flats was. We narrowed it down by a process of elimination (the flats were new when my parents moved in and the building they’re located in is the only one on the street from that era. Everything else was either much older or brand new). But the building itself brought no sparks of memory. My mother eventually confirmed that it was definitely the right place because she recognised the clothes lines in the backyard, from which a couple of my father’s shirts had been stolen. Shirts my grandmother had sent him from London.

Ten years after this experience my parents were back in Sydney, this time with me. We spent a few months in a flat in Burwood. Two days after our Newtown expedition we went to find that Burwood flat. My father identified the house it was in straight away. I hardly remembered it. I knew it must be the right place though, because of the park across the road, the park where K and I used to swing on the swings and then jump off from as high as we could. The park today has elements of a new playground and elements of an old playground. The new playground has soft material underfoot, so that when children fall the ground will be kind. The old playground consists of an ageing swingset and it has concrete underfoot, as did all my beloved play areas from my childhood. But are those old swings old enough? I don’t think so. I remember K and I swinging together, right next to each other. And these swings are in a circle, if they’re the same ones we would have been swinging across from each other. But I can’t say for sure.

I don’t remember the house from the outside but I have impressions of what it was like to be inside. We had an upstairs flat and K and I had the run of the building. I remember the time there was a storm and lightning came in the window on the upstairs landing and K and I screamed. Or was it just me? I remember the metal slinky going slowly down the stairs to the ground floor. I don’t think it was mine, it was K’s. I think I’d had one and somehow it had broken and I was so envious of hers at that moment. I remember the man who liked sherry who had to go away one Saturday morning. Was his flat across from ours? My dad was helping him in some way but I wasn’t allowed to go in.

Proust’s memories of his childhood in Combray existed only around the trauma of his bedtimes, every other moment was contained in a past that he thought was dead to him. Until he ate the madeleine, and then almost like a stage set all the lights came on and each room in that house lit up and made itself known to him and then it wasn’t just the house blazing with light but the street outside and then the whole town.

We continue to wait for our own dead past to rise again from our memories. In the meantime I content myself with reading Proust as if it were a commentary on my own life.

Posted in proust, sydney, times goes by so | 2 Comments

every building on the sunset strip 1966

I was in the Art Gallery of New South Wales yesterday. I spent my time mostly in their contemporary rooms and had one of those inspiring gallery experiences, the kind where you feel that the rooms have become a playground. Childlike, I roamed freely, absorbing ideas and experiences and feelings. My favourite things were their Sidney Nolan room (Nolan, a new discovery for me), footage of Gilbert and George performing Underneath the Arches, and, most and best of all, their copy of Ed Ruscha’s book Every Building on the Sunset Strip.

How much I would have liked to have taken pictures just like those on Brunswick Street in Brisbane in 1994 or Bethnal Green and Roman Roads in London in 2002.

It’s not too late. Is it too late?

Posted in art, sydney, times goes by so | Leave a comment

the blue

Baking hot and shivering. The waves and the boats and the blue. Water against rocks, leaves scrape the ground. If I could I would blink the boats away. Me and the blue.

Wanting to surrender myself to the sun. Hiding in the shade. Grandparents with pram. Doggy walks by. Senior citizen. Stately with red bandanna for effect. Not too old to roll in the grass.

Warm cold wind hurting my ears. Birds hang in the air.

New doggy. Stops to look at water. Gets splashed. On his way.

A ferry is arriving. It’s full but with another blink of my eye it will empty. Empty of more than the passengers. It rumbles, backwards, away. It’s going to take me into the blue. This moment hasn’t passed. It hasn’t passed.

Posted in sydney, times goes by so | Leave a comment

2010 in sydney is still only 2009 in london

I kept a diary when I was 15. I had completely forgotten about its existence until I rediscovered it a couple of weeks ago. Of course I immediately began reading it and as I read I went from being an outsider looking at myself back then to suddenly feeling as if I’d just been writing the diary and I’d laid down my pen and only popped out for a minute. And thousands and millions of minutes had gone by, but they were no time at all.

And so now I stand teetering on the edge of the old year. And the old decade. If I lose my balance which year will I fall into and which decade? 2010 in Sydney will still only be 2009 in London. And inside my body, I honestly don’t know what year it is. Since the mid 90s I’ve always felt that the years were running ahead of me, just for the hell of it, not because the numbers on the calendar were true. I’d say maybe it’s really only 2004 or 2005 but it could still be the 1990s for all I know.  And somewhere not very far away, that teenage girl writes and I don’t manage to look over until she slips out of the room. But she was just there. I know that she was just there.

Posted in bombshell | Leave a comment

October the First Is Too Late

October the First Is Too Late
written by Fred Hoyle,
published in 1966.

I read this book and wrote this review about a month or so ago, immediately after finishing Paul Davies’ About Time. I wasn’t sure about sharing something that is purely a book review in this space (as opposed to a piece of writing that is inspired by or a reaction to having read the book), but decided that as this blog is increasingly becoming my working-out space for my thoughts about time, it all fits. So it’s belated, but here it is:

First thing I have to say is that for most of the book I thought it didn’t have a vigorous-enough plot line to explain the scientific stuff that was going on. One of the characters is a scientist and he is the decoder for us of the big events that happen in the book. These events concern time and how the world falls out of sync so that different countries are operating in different time periods. So it’s ancient times in Greece and 1917 in France and 1966 in the UK. All at the same time. The scientist explains all of this in terms of Einstein’s theory of block time: there is no such thing as the past, the present and the future as divisions of time. Every moment exists already. Past and future are only directions. This is why I read the book – to see how Hoyle used the novelistic form to treat this abstract concept.

But what we get is the scientist surmising what’s going on (and turning out to be right), but not actually explaining his reasoning. So as readers we’re hearing huge ideas that are coming out of nowhere. Big conclusions that the scientist seems to have just decided are true and that we can’t see the evidence for. Of course, in theoretical physics scientists do actually discover laws of physics through thought and calculations, not through experiments. But in a novel, we require a little more in terms of plot development.

However, chapter 14 makes up for a lot. Our characters have found a section of the Earth that is in the far future and they must decide whether to stay there or return to the past. There are consequences for themselves in that decision. It’s all explained very well a little earlier in the book (in chapter 7) using an analogy of our consciousness being like the contents of a series of pigeon holes lit in any direction by a random light. Effectively our life’s moments could be out of order but we don’t notice anything. According to our perception time takes us forward as usual. There could even be two versions of us, as long as only one consciousness is aware at any one time. This is the idea on which the book turns and clearly the reason it was written. It’s a scientific idea beautifully illustrated by the choice the characters must make. The moment of my understanding was glorious.

Posted in books, physics | Leave a comment

a weekend in physics

So I spent the weekend pondering how it’s possible for particles to tell the time. Specifically, subatomic particles called kaons, which seem to know the difference between past and future (I’m still trying to understand this). I also tried to get my head around the fact that time might somehow have evolved out of space (Stephen Hawking’s theory); had the idea put to me that maybe time isn’t continuous but runs together fast enough that we think it is; and wondered about all the parallel universes that there might be with time running forwards in some and backwards in others, and then the small minority with reversals in time part-way through. (The “quantum fuzziness” inherent in quantum physics seems to practically demand parallel universes.)

The book I was reading, Paul Davies’ About Time: Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution ends on questions about “block time”, my discovery of last Monday. If physics has abolished “the” past, “the” present, and “the” future as divisions of time, as opposed to just “past” and “future”, which are purely directions in time, what does that mean for us as human beings when we have a feeling of time flowing. Is that feeling an illusion? What time is “now”? It’s “now” as I type this but then it’s immediately in the past. We can’t pin down “now”. Clocks only measure duration between events, not time as such. So what does that all mean?

The problem here is the theory of relativity (which is proven) vs human experience of time (which is inescapable to us).

And time is a place? I guess that’s my own personal metaphor. And I’m still thinking about that one.

Posted in physics, times goes by so | Leave a comment